skip to content
parallax background

Is There Really a Seven-Year Tribulation?

Book Out NOW
April 16, 2020
What is your biggest conspiracy theory?
June 20, 2020
Book Out NOW
April 16, 2020
What is your biggest conspiracy theory?
June 20, 2020

The Challenge, prove a 7-Year Tribulation


I t was met with a voice, and I just wanted to respond to some, if not all the comments and verses, yet not give away to much as the book goes over most of it.

So the challenge is simple, to prove a seven-year tribulation, here is exactly what I said.

There are a lot of people who are saying that this book is not true and is an opinion. However, they have not read this book, nor, it seems, have they read the Bible. Instead, they have read other books that have put forward an opinion that was created by a famous author of a Bible's commentary. I put forward this challenge if anyone can prove in that there is, in the Bible a verse that says that there will be a seven-year period of tribulation in the future, I will pay them $100 US. Not opinions just facts. IT MUST BE CLEAR, no explanation. NOTE: I added verse must be in the KJV as there is one Bible that does actually say somethings which are an opinion.

So here is my response for those who say Daniel 9:27 is one of the verses. Firstly, you need to go back to school, and learn the basics of grammar, when you read Daniel 9:27, the correct way, the whole meaning of the verse changes, to what people teach. For a better description, read "The Trouble With The Tribulation: Why The 7 Year Tribulation Isn't According To The Bible" The book shows what I am talking about. If you want more proof, when one looks for proof of this grammar and to see if the correct use of grammar works, then one just needs to look who confirms the covenant, which I do in the book. And while it was not a surprise, the person the KJV Bible names correctly does confirm the covenant, and it is clear. See the book.

Revelation 11:2,3 which says, Rev 11:2 But the court, which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Rev 11:3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
While this verse does say about how long the witnesses are on the earth, there is no proof this happens in the tribulation for two reasons. The first being that there is no mention of tribulation in Revelation 11, prior the verse is Revelation 7:14, which shows that the tribulation has occurred, does not fit the timeline, but I actually know that Revelation overlaps, but this does not help the argument proving a 7-year tribulation. The second is the problem with Daniel 9:27. The verse tells the reader, that there is no need for a 7-year tribulation, ... Buy the Book??? maybe.

Revelation 13:5 says Rev 13:5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. See the above paragraph, same thing applies, on both points. There is a third point, when one looks at the argument, the 7-year tribulation position has a lot of questions, like who is the mystery of God in Revelation10:7, which this position cannot touch as it is confusing, however, my book does cover it and more. The other verse one may say is Revelation 12:6 which says, And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. again I rely on the above paragraph.


 
T here is one other point I would like to address, and that is the Pre-Wrath position. While I did for a short period of time in my study did look at this position. There are some conflict in this position but for most they say that there is only three and half years left, but this position has two issue, in my mind. First is that where does it say in the Bible to cut a piece of the Triublation from the 490 years and move it to the future. The second which is covered in the Book, and a point to make here is, if any opinions are in the book, this is one but I state it clearly. Again read the book, and you will see why I tell you this.

Comments are closed.